Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The answer to that is yes. We've had a lot of discussions with the city. We've also had a number of discussions with some of the tenants who are on airport land. The concern for water and sewer services is something that is a growing one. Right now, fire protection on some of the new infrastructure that is coming up is proving to be very costly as you have to be able to have so much retention of water available in the case of a fire. Our leases do not specify that we will provide water and sewer services. The city, up to now, has not been willing to do so and we've hired a consultant. We've set up a working group and have hired a consultant to look at the issue regarding the supply of water and sewer services, what is the best way to do this, what is the most cost-effective way to do this, and also how would it be paid for? So we have been working on this initiative for the last little while. We've just gone out to the public process of securing a consultant. So that's something we will be doing.
As to sitting down with the city discussing a trade-off or paying for another portion of infrastructure someplace else in the city, no, we haven't done that. Up until now, we have been looking at the Kam Lake bypass road. We have our reasons for extending that road up to a certain point .The city would like to see it extended right through into the Kam Lake area. We still have to have a lot of discussion over that.