Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Of course we'll be discussing those details shortly in Committee of the Whole and we can get into that. My understanding of where the RCMP will be putting those officers -- and we can have that discussion -- operationally, of course, they make the decisions based on their needs. It is possible that they will define a resource or an RCMP officer for one community and move it in six months, depending on workload. So I'll give the Member that detail today in Committee of the Whole. We can have that discussion. We will engage Parks Canada. I think it's important to recognize and remember that Public Works Canada will make decisions about actual infrastructure in the communities. The Member knows we are doing an assessment of those assets on the ground, both the residence and the detachment. I look forward to having some information soon and I have committed to the Member that, at my earliest opportunity to meet with the new Minister Day, I will be raising this issue specific to policing in smaller communities and the need for a detachment in Sachs. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Brendan Bell on Question 438-15(4): Need For Rcmp Presence In Sachs Harbour
In the Legislative Assembly on February 21st, 2006. See this statement in context.
Further Return To Question 438-15(4): Need For Rcmp Presence In Sachs Harbour
Question 438-15(4): Need For Rcmp Presence In Sachs Harbour
Item 6: Oral Questions
February 20th, 2006
Page 1182
See context to find out what was said next.