Okay. I know that, in your guidelines, you try to apply them equally to all the communities, but I think some of the feedback I have been getting is that it is quite often that the people, as they travel around, they will see a different side of the equipment in another community and say why didn't they get that? So it just comes up to the question. Is it being equally applied to all communities?
Just recently, I toured one of my smaller communities. They are saying that it appears, when it comes to infrastructure or equipment, our community gets left out or we get a smaller piece of equipment. It seems that they are not applying the guidelines equitably and fairly. I was just wondering if there is a way to ensure the communities, by the department, that programs and guidelines are being applied equitably to all the communities, just so that they see that one community is not being taken care of above another community, especially the remote ones. They tend to feel that, Mr. Chair. Just with respect to that, as an example, perhaps the Minister can explain how a capital need is addressed in a community from the ground up, just the various stages from identifying need up until it makes the capital plan -- cradle to grave -- and then what they do with the equipment once it is no good to the community.