Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I'm not sure where we would play a role in the $500 million that was brought forward as part of the pipeline discussions. I'm not sure, actually, how that money's going to flow. I don't think it's definite yet.
The money that has been earmarked or the new money that has come forward, the gas tax, the MRIF, the CPI, the land tax, the Northern Strategy funding, is all flowing forward as part of a couple of initiatives, I guess. First of all, we are committed to transferring the responsibility of capital infrastructure to the communities. We want the communities to be able to make their own decisions. This is all part of the initiative that we've called a New Deal for community governments.
As part of that, we did an analysis, and I don't think too many other jurisdictions have done this or are doing this, but what we've done is we conducted an infrastructure deficit analysis in both the tax-based and the non-tax-based communities. That gave us a real clear picture, or at least a very good understanding of where we were in terms of meeting the community needs in the areas of infrastructure. In the tax-based communities it was reported back to us that we were meeting...What was it?