Thank you. In part of that little description/definition the last sentence says the GNWT must complete prior, these activities must be complete prior to the agreement. Why are we saying this sort of after the fact? This is sort of the definition that says in advance of the agreements we have to spend this type of money. The agreement came into effect last year in August. So again, the definition is probably the problem here. So maybe if the Minister could provide some clarification why we're still spending $70,000 in this area if this is money to be for the vamping up of the effective date. Thank you.
Robert Hawkins on Committee Motion 19-15(4) Recommendation To The Municipal And Community Affairs Remedy Access To Land Issues, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on February 8th, 2006. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 19-15(4) Recommendation To The Municipal And Community Affairs Remedy Access To Land Issues, Carried
Item 17: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
February 8th, 2006
Page 875
See context to find out what was said next.