Thank you, Madam Chair. I'm only just surprised because, maybe it's only me concerned with this, but if we're acknowledging that a volume of space needs to be required for a year and that volume of space, even though we have a lease running out here in two months, but the typical volume of space for 12 months will cost us $358,000, why wouldn't we acknowledge that any year going forward would still require that type of volume of space, which would be relatively the same amount? I'm sure it's just an accounting reason. It just seems like an anomaly that, I don't know. Because, I mean, we're going to have to lease from somewhere else or we're going to have to buy it from somewhere else. So there must be some plan why the lease rate drops to the floor. Are they planning to build a new building, which would then be structured under some different mathematical category, or is it just an accounting, is it just a way to account for this? I'm not an accountant, so I'll respect it if that's the way you have to account for this. Thank you.
Robert Hawkins on Item 17: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
In the Legislative Assembly on February 8th, 2006. See this statement in context.
Item 17: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 17: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
February 7th, 2006
Page 854
See context to find out what was said next.