Madam Chair, I support the motion. The information that I have is that the Housing Corporation has really not exercised any kind of degree of creativity or flexibility in this. It just wants to continue doing business the same way. Let's just add some more PYs here, let's just continue growing this government instead of looking at what I believe, Madam Chair, would be opportunities within headquarters. As Mr. Ramsay has indicated, the intent of this motion is to say where are existing resources, PYs, where are priorities that could be shifted and that could be applied to look after this new opportunity or this new situation. We're not being, I think, very nimble or certainly very efficient in this venture here. So the consequence of this motion being approved, of course, is that the corporation will be then forced to go back into its own resources, into its existing shop and say, okay, what can we do better? How can we use existing resources to get a better job done? That is the point of this motion, Madam Chair, and that's why I'm supporting it. Thank you.
Bill Braden on Committee Motion 22-15(5): To Delete $367,000 From Nwthc In Bill 2, Defeated
In the Legislative Assembly on June 6th, 2006. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 22-15(5): To Delete $367,000 From Nwthc In Bill 2, Defeated
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
June 6th, 2006
Page 186
See context to find out what was said next.