Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I was just waiting for my light to come on. I just wanted to take another swing at this. I will give it my best shot. Again, I really have trouble grasping or understanding how you could take $30 million from the Housing Corporation's budget, put it over at ECE, hire 14 people at ECE to administer that money and then look at this year adding an additional 17 positions inside the Housing Corporation. I know earlier it was mentioned that under the Supported Lease Program you don't have the staffing at the regional level to deliver the Supported Lease Program, so you actually have to contact out to get that work done. Mr. Chairman, something doesn't quite add up when I think about that. When you are running any organization, you try to make the best use of the personnel that you have and I don't know if you are doing that through this whole transfer of the social policy or housing policy and the $30 million over to ECE. I don't know if we have managed that effectively from a staffing level.
I guess that leads me to another observation or suggestion. I know the Minister has mentioned the fact that the new lands and technical officers will be term positions, but in our materials they are always shown as indeterminate full-time whether they are term or not. I think, going forward, we need to spell that out. If they are term positions, they can't be shown as indeterminate full-time in our materials. If that is not the case, then it's a misrepresentation of what you are proposing. You have said it yourself, they are term positions. Are they indeterminate or are they term? I think that's the question I have, Mr. Chairman.