Thank you, Mr. Chairman. If we didn't have the $100 million affordable housing initiative, then we would not need 16 of those positions. But when you are almost doubling your delivery, then it is going to take more. So if we were to set that aside, you'd find that there isn't a huge difference.
The other one is with the LHOs. It was a fraction of somebody's time in each of the communities. It wasn't as if we could just take a position out of the LHO who did the rent subsidies and so on themselves. So we had to give them the means to be able to continue to be sure people had good quality housing and programs. We could not take positions away, so there was some creation of new positions there in Education. So it's always difficult with the LHOs who were probably overworked anyway at the regional levels.
Most of the accumulation of the growth is because of the doubling of the delivery by the Housing Corporation. In terms of these other positions now, the ones related to the affordable housing initiative, they are term positions. It's in the business plan as term positions. We follow a standard format in doing all the budget estimates. So you won't find in here any category for term positions. They are listed as indeterminate, seasonal, part-time and so on. If you go back to the business plans, you will find they are term positions. They will phase out when the affordable housing initiative is over.