Thank you, Madam Chair. I appreciate those explanations. Another project that is defined here, Madam Chair, is the additional funding related to the costs associated with repairing the floor of the new Whati community hall. Three hundred seventy-five thousand dollars is requested for this repair, Madam Chair. Madam Chair, this is a new building or at least one that has been under construction and was started within the last couple of years. Why is the department coming back to the Assembly for repair costs for a brand new building? The logical question to ask first is who made the mistake? Obviously a mistake was made. As I say, this is a new building. Why aren't they being held accountable for the cost of this repair or this error of this $375,000 repair bill, Madam Chair?
Bill Braden on Committee Motion 51-15(5): To Delete $682,000 From Human Resources, Operations Expenditures In Bill 22, Supplementary Appropriation Act, No. 3, 2006-2007, Defeated
In the Legislative Assembly on March 9th, 2007. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 51-15(5): To Delete $682,000 From Human Resources, Operations Expenditures In Bill 22, Supplementary Appropriation Act, No. 3, 2006-2007, Defeated
Revert To Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
March 8th, 2007
Page 1412
See context to find out what was said next.