You know, Mr. Chair, it seems that the kind of things the Minister just outlined as reasons for the increment are the kinds of things that could easily, and quite properly, have been built into the scoping of this project originally on training, new licensing, a couple of modules or whatever it is. How is it that these things are missed out in the original outline? This, again, Mr. Chair, is where I go back to the reliance that I have on the planners, designers, engineers and builders of our very existence here to bring forward complete and well-thought-out projects or initiatives for me to consider and approve. I have to say that I find the explanation inadequate.
As I indicated at the beginning of our session this afternoon, I am going to be pointing out the projects that I think should really be the department's responsible for bringing them forward should really be looking at why it is they are coming back to the taxpayer to ask for more money when a project has been low-balled or poorly presented in the first place. I don't have any more questions, but I just want to leave that concern very clearly on the table, Mr. Chair.