I think, if the Member looks at 1.1(c), the principle that's expressed is that the compensation system will treat workers and claimants fairly, compassionately and respectfully. That's consistent with section 92(2)(b), which says that you don't have to...I mean the effect of it is that if the worker can't prove that what he's trying to establish is more likely than not, then he or she gets that benefit. As long as it's 50/50, and that's consistent with the principle in section 1.1(c), which is treating workers compassionately and fairly. You're saying if you can't disprove what the worker's saying, then the worker gets the benefit.
Mr. Wright on Committee Motion 16-15(6): Amend Clause 65 Of Bill 6, Workers' Compensation Act, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on August 21st, 2007. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 16-15(6): Amend Clause 65 Of Bill 6, Workers' Compensation Act, Carried
Item 20: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
August 21st, 2007
Page 489
Wright
See context to find out what was said next.