Mahsi, Mr. Chair. I just want to highlight why we’ve proposed. There’s no implication on the program itself. It does not jeopardize the program. The program does continue to be delivered at these corrections. At the same time, Mr. Chair, what we’re proposing here are some changes to the current positions that we have, and there are also vacant positions. These two individuals that are potentially impacted will certainly have the opportunity to move up to another position — case managers. They do have many years of experience. They have a really good chance of fulfilling these positions, and it is the same people who will be delivering that particular program. So really, at the end of the day, you probably won’t see any layoffs due to that fact, once these two positions are filled by current individuals.
So that’s part of the reason why we proposed this, Mr. Chair. We were given a target — being cost-effective and also effective program delivery — so we felt the need to reduce those two positions but at the same time to fill another two positions, possibly with the two same individuals.
So with that, Mr. Chair, I just want to remark that as part of our mandate as Justice, we’ll be moving forward on this, just for the record. We’re not impacting on a program delivered at these corrections. Mahsi.