Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you to the Member for the question. It’s a combination of both. It’s not necessarily a capacity issue at the LHO, but it’s an overall capacity. It’s also a matter of the good fortune, I guess, that we have. On the one hand, we’re in the last year of the Affordable Housing Initiative, with a fairly robust capital program. What we attempted to do was balance our ability overall to deliver with the resources available to us, recognizing that at the end of the day we wanted to have the most positive benefit for the communities.
In our judgment it was important to get the capital program rolled out. We would absolutely agree that maintenance is an important undertaking for the Housing Corporation. It’s also clearly understood by the Housing Corporation that these three years of the affordable housing bill have been probably the most rigorous capital plan we’ve undertaken in a number of years. It is a challenge to get as much done as we would like to. It was a bit of a balancing act, from our perspective. While on the one hand, as I said, it’s good to have the capital money and it’s recognized that maintenance is very important, we were trying to make decisions based on where we thought we would have the most positive impact and, at the same time, the least amount of impact in the communities.