Thank you, Mr. Chair, and I thank the Member for that question.
Once again, it’s an excellent question, and it’s one that we certainly spent a lot of time considering when we were looking at different areas where we may want to make reductions. It was a balance. We do have maintenance and improvement money elsewhere that we feel is going to make important contributions to the overall housing stock. But it was, once again, a question that we posed to ourselves, in looking at our capital build project and trying to come to a balanced approach between capital and maintenance — recognizing that there were some capacity issues — and also looking over the longer term where we fully anticipate, once the size of our capital build has gone down, refocusing our energies on maintenance. We anticipate that’s probably where our priority is going to be when the federal one-time-only money is gone. So that was the approach we took.