That answer doesn’t make any
sense to me at all. I guess I’m wondering why you’ve taken the leap to go into the ’09–10 year when we’re still doing the ’08–09 year, and there are six individuals there that you’ve told their jobs are going to be eliminated. Do they know that their jobs are being eliminated in ’09–10 or, rather, potentially eliminated in ’09–10, given that we have done neither business planning nor budgeting at
this point? It still seems a little premature. I’m not sure the union would tell you to lay off anybody at this point in time. In fact, if you listen to the rhetoric out there, it’s kind of exactly the opposite. So if you can help me understand any of that, that’d be great.