So that then means that there won’t
be any funding available for businesses who wish to do an energy audit. Is that correct?
In the Legislative Assembly on June 10th, 2008. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 42-16(2) To Reinstate $100,000 In Contribution Funding For The Diavik Socio-Economic Agreement Under The ITI Minerals And Resources Activity (Committee Motion Carried)
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
June 9th, 2008
Wendy Bisaro Frame Lake
So that then means that there won’t
be any funding available for businesses who wish to do an energy audit. Is that correct?
See context to find out what was said next.
Please only include contact information if you would like to hear back.