Thank you, Mr. Chair. I would just like to follow up on my colleague’s questions a little bit, seeking a bit more clarity. I think most — perhaps all — jurisdictions except for the Northwest Territories have ensured that in their lands acts they have the ability for financial security on leases for developments. Of course, the absence of that for us led to a very large expenditure a few years ago: $26 million or $27 million. I believe we’re paying $1 million a year on that.
If I’m right, my colleague’s concern is the same as mine: we could get some protection from that. I don’t know what role FMBS plays here, but I would think they would at least be a consultant, if not an important part of resolving this. Right now we’re unable to levy that condition for leases so we can recover financial costs not covered by a company that leaves a large environmental liability behind.