Mr. Chairman, the process used was that…. For example, even in our calculation here within Executive, we had three initially that would have been affected as a result of sunset. We’ve gone back and got one position through our strategic initiatives. Those have been incorporated in the overall target numbers for reductions. So if a program was sunsetted to end already because the program ended through dollars that ended at the end of this fiscal year, those have been incorporated into the reductions and have been figured into the equation.
The new positions…. In some cases, as we’ve again highlighted here, instead of three being impacted as a result of the sunset, we went back for one under strategic initiative. That gets counted in the 14.5, for example. There are others that could have been incorporated in the 14.5.
Throughout this document, though, as the Member has pointed out, when you go through that detail and look at what other growth is in there, you will find these other 124 positions. Some aren’t identified, though, Mr. Chairman: for example, the increase in PTR. It’s hard to come up with actual numbers, because that funding growth is given to authorities, and they have the flexibility of hiring additional staff or using them in program areas. It is for staff. They manage it, though. That’s the one area.
Some — for example, the hiring of relief nurses and other areas — are hard to pinpoint actual positions for throughout the year.