Thank you, Mr. Chair. I support the motion. I feel that in a consensus style of government, it doesn't hurt to add more resources to the whole thinking side of the strategic initiatives.
I think that when the MLAs from P&P, Priorities and Planning, get together, there's a lot of synergy. We get a lot of information off each other. We spend a lot of time talking about all the various things that our communities are asking us to bring to the table and asking us to work on. This is an opportunity for the government to take advantage of the minds, I guess is how I could put it, across on this side of the floor. We have a lot of good ideas, and I think that Cabinet, with their strategic initiatives, have a chance to add some more good ideas to the ideas that they have and the ideas that they see as strategic initiatives.
To stop this thing going back and forth, we want to be on these committees. "We could do it without you guys" is the type of discussion that's been going on for a couple of months. I think it's important and there's no harm in bringing more people to the table. It's a good way to create additional synergy, I guess, as I put it earlier, in each of these committees, and there's no harm in bringing good ideas. All of us over here have a lot of good ideas, and each of us has our own strategic initiatives, and we would have strength in the various strategic initiatives that have been put forward by Cabinet.
With that, I'll be supporting the motion.