Thanks to the Minister for that. That kind of clarifies it a bit. He said that it was just a one-time requirement, and it’s to better reflect the numbers because of the shift from doing the infrastructure budget a different way. So this is just a one-time thing. It’s not something that we can expect to see in the future. And if that’s the reason for having the negatives in this particular appropriation, then I don’t have much of a problem with that. It just seemed to be too much of a bookkeeping exercise to me. But I appreciate the Minister’s explanation.
Bob McLeod on Tabled Document 75-16(2): Supplementary Appropriation No. 2, 2008–2009
In the Legislative Assembly on October 2nd, 2008. See this statement in context.
Tabled Document 75-16(2): Supplementary Appropriation No. 2, 2008–2009
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
October 1st, 2008
See context to find out what was said next.