Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Just a question. The motion reads that we’re only
deferring what’s on pages 4-4 and 4-5, not the whole department. Is that correct?
In the Legislative Assembly on October 15th, 2008. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 79-16(2) Deferral Of Consideration Of Asset Management Activity In Public Works And Services Capital Estimates (Td 93-16(2)) (Committee Motion Carried)
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
October 14th, 2008
Wendy Bisaro Frame Lake
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Just a question. The motion reads that we’re only
deferring what’s on pages 4-4 and 4-5, not the whole department. Is that correct?
See context to find out what was said next.
Please only include contact information if you would like to hear back.