Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I have a question for the Minister of Health and Social Services in regards to medical travel. Mr. Speaker, I have a constituent who has travelled to Edmonton regularly for medical travel reasons. They have been referred to see specialists, of course. The question of them going on medical travel isn’t the issue, but this time around they chose to rent a car because it was cheaper than spending the money on taxi fare. As I understand it, it worked to half the rate of the typical taxi fares. In this age of trying to find ways to do business just a little better and wiser, they have been told no by Inuvik, that, wow, you didn’t get pre-approval. So even though it is cheaper and you save the government money, sorry, you can’t do it and you have to absorb the cost. Would the Minister of Health and Social Services look into this example -- I will give her the name privately on the side -- to see if there is a way we can encourage this type of behaviour that, if we have proven costs and if constituents find it cheaper, they will do so? Thank you.
Debates of March 2nd, 2009
This is page numbers 2655 - 2704 of the Hansard for the 16th Assembly, 3rd Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was communities.
Topics
Question 229-16(3): Cost-Effective Medical Travel Alternatives
Oral Questions
Question 229-16(3): Cost-Effective Medical Travel Alternatives
Oral Questions

The Speaker Paul Delorey
Thank you, Mr. Hawkins. The honourable Minister of Health and Social Services, Ms. Lee.
Question 229-16(3): Cost-Effective Medical Travel Alternatives
Oral Questions
Range Lake

Sandy Lee Minister of Health and Social Services
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I am not aware of this specific situation, but if the Member could give me the details, I will make the commitment to look into that. If the transportation costs are cheaper and we can prove this, I think we should look at a way to incorporate that into the policy. Thank you.
Question 229-16(3): Cost-Effective Medical Travel Alternatives
Oral Questions

The Speaker Paul Delorey
Thank you, Ms. Lee. The honourable Member for Hay River South, Mrs. Groenewegen.
Question 230-16(3): Atco Proposal To Merge With NWT Power Corporation
Oral Questions

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I have follow-up questions to my previous questions about the various reviews that are being undertaken with respect to power in the Northwest Territories. In follow-up to my colleague Mr. Hawkins’ questions and his reference to secret handshakes and stuff like that, just because ATCO
put an unsolicited proposal on the table, I don’t think they should get beat up in this Assembly. They are a company, the founders of whom I know well and they are I think a very much to be respected and admired company from what they have been able to do in the private sector. I just want to clearly say that I don’t have any issues with ATCO, the ownership or the people. That doesn’t mean I want to sell them the Power Corporation.
Mr. Speaker, the Power Corporation proposal suggests a five-year freeze on rates. That is a very short window, really, in the scheme of things. Power is an essential service. The GNWT is the biggest customer of power in the Northwest Territories, so I ask the Premier, a five-year freeze on power, but then what input do we have in terms of power rate setting? Right now, we own the Power Corporation and it is not the best scenario right now. I’m sure if you go out on this little review and ask, what you do you think of the NWT Power Corporation, it won’t be a very happy answer right now. People are unhappy. People are crabby about their power bills. Mr. Speaker, we are the biggest consumer of this essential service here as the Government of the Northwest Territories. Does the Premier agree that this is an essential service that the government should retain control of? Thank you.
Question 230-16(3): Atco Proposal To Merge With NWT Power Corporation
Oral Questions
Question 230-16(3): Atco Proposal To Merge With NWT Power Corporation
Oral Questions
Inuvik Boot Lake

Floyd Roland Premier
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Some of the comments the Member has made in this area leads to what may be in the future. Right now it is an essential service. That is treated as such. We end up dealing as the biggest user and the supplier of power in the North. We end up dealing on an annual basis with either rate riders or the increased cost of that. We have to look at those areas. I believe that, as the proposals have been sent in to us, it is of interest. That is why we have this initial phase of reviewing that and would decide at a future date if we should go in on that date I have given to Members earlier. Thank you.
Question 230-16(3): Atco Proposal To Merge With NWT Power Corporation
Oral Questions

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
To the review of the Power Corporation and its operations, essentially the Power Corporation gets audited every time they go to the PUB for general rate applications. So we just have been through a GRA; we have just been through a general rate application. I wasn’t there. I don’t know all the ins and outs of the kinds of costs that go into the rates that are set, the kind of return on investment. Were we there at the general rate application proceedings as the Government of the Northwest Territories observing those proceedings? Did we learn anything from that? Thank you.
Question 230-16(3): Atco Proposal To Merge With NWT Power Corporation
Oral Questions
Inuvik Boot Lake

Floyd Roland Premier
I can’t speak for the last general rate application, if we had people there and
what role they were playing in taking in the information. The Power Corporation is our corporation. We are the sole shareholder. We’ve been aware of the information. The Member is right; through the PUB, it is a rigorous process that it goes through. We have also heard from Members of this House and people across the Territory when they have to deal with the bump of rates. Whether it is a rate rider or a fuel stabilization rate rider or low water rate rider or just a general rate application increase, we have heard from people of the North that something has to be done to looking at that. We have heard many times by Members of this House concerns about the operation of the Power Corporation. The review and the initiatives we’re under will give us more clarity in the steps we will need to take in the future. Thank you.
Question 230-16(3): Atco Proposal To Merge With NWT Power Corporation
Oral Questions

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
Mr. Speaker, the PUB has already clearly stated in answers to the questions in the past with respect to the types of rate structures that are in place in the Northwest Territories, that they are not in the business of social engineering when it comes to power rates; they are interested in the economic cost of producing power. If the Government of the Northwest Territories, through our policies as the shareholder in the Power Corporation, want to affect rates through our Territorial Support Subsidy Program, that’s entirely up to us. We take the dividends in the Power Corporation, we finance the territorial support. We have a lot of capacity for doing things within our control already with respect to the rates in the smaller communities. Have we done enough? Are there other things that we could do to help offset the high costs, particularly in the diesel communities? Thank you.
Question 230-16(3): Atco Proposal To Merge With NWT Power Corporation
Oral Questions
Inuvik Boot Lake

Floyd Roland Premier
Mr. Speaker, the high cost of energy, one, is predominantly felt in the diesel communities is correct; but as we’ve seen lately, communities served by hydro felt the bite as well. We’ve heard a number of stories about the concerns of the increase in those communities. We have to look at all our options and that’s what the work that’s undergoing now through the Ministerial Energy Coordinating Committee, the review of the Power Corporation and the review of the ATCO proposal is to see what options are realistically on the table and what that might mean for the future of the North. Thank you.
Question 230-16(3): Atco Proposal To Merge With NWT Power Corporation
Oral Questions
March 1st, 2009
Question 230-16(3): Atco Proposal To Merge With NWT Power Corporation
Oral Questions

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
The very thing that makes this a timely discussion is also something quite unprecedented. We’ve just gone through the highest price per barrel of crude oil in history and this necessarily affects production of energy in the Northwest Territories. Mr. Speaker, has the government looked at how the increases in the cost
of energy here in the Northwest Territories compare with the kinds of increases that have been experienced by Canadians in other jurisdictions? Thank you.
Question 230-16(3): Atco Proposal To Merge With NWT Power Corporation
Oral Questions
Inuvik Boot Lake

Floyd Roland Premier
Mr. Speaker, we do comparisons on the cost per kilowatt hour. It is very difficult, though, to find another jurisdiction like the Northwest Territories except, for example, Nunavut, and they’re even more predominantly dependent on fossil fuels. We have a mix of hydro and diesel. The Yukon has even more hydro than we do. Comparisons to southern jurisdictions is very different because they have a much larger rate base and that’s what also affects and drives our costs, but that shouldn’t stop us from looking at the future possibilities of what we can do as a government to try and stabilize rates, lower rates and make affordable living a reality in our communities. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Question 230-16(3): Atco Proposal To Merge With NWT Power Corporation
Oral Questions
Question 231-16(3): Review Of Power Rates And Power Corporation Operations
Oral Questions

Norman Yakeleya Sahtu
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I want to ask questions to the lead Minister on the Energy Coordinating Committee in terms of the review that’s going to be taking place in the Northwest Territories on rates and electricity review. In terms of these types of consultations that are happening in the Northwest Territories, can the Minister inform the House here, in terms of this type of discussion, will it be open and transparent with all the information and no set predetermination as to the information that’s going to be given to the people in those communities in terms of how they see the review of the electricity and the rates in the North here?
Question 231-16(3): Review Of Power Rates And Power Corporation Operations
Oral Questions

The Speaker Paul Delorey
Thank you, Mr. Yakeleya. The honourable lead Minister for the Energy Coordinating Committee, Mr. Bob McLeod.
Question 231-16(3): Review Of Power Rates And Power Corporation Operations
Oral Questions

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As the Member knows, we’ve spent a considerable amount of time with the standing committees to ensure that we got the right questions out there and also we prepared a number of discussion papers. We’ve laid out a very ambitious communications strategy and it’s our intention to go into a number of communities and make sure all of these meetings are well advertised and that we get as many people out as possible. We do have a committee panel that’s been established and we will be counting on the panel to respond as to what they hear through their consultations. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Question 231-16(3): Review Of Power Rates And Power Corporation Operations
Oral Questions

Norman Yakeleya Sahtu
Mr. Speaker, the communities are at somewhat of a disadvantage because, and I’m not too sure if there are any resources available to them for research information in terms of the rates in terms of the suggestions they may come forward with. The panel may have all the research available to them, but do the communities have some type of a fund available to them to do their own research in terms of looking at some solutions that may be brought up through these consultations?
Question 231-16(3): Review Of Power Rates And Power Corporation Operations
Oral Questions

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South
We have very limited funds available for energy planning and we would be interested in hearing what concerns individuals have with regard to their energy costs. We will be expecting businesses that will be impacted to pay their own way when they participate. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Question 231-16(3): Review Of Power Rates And Power Corporation Operations
Oral Questions

The Speaker Paul Delorey
Thank you, Mr. McLeod. The time for question period has expired; however, I will allow the Member a short supplementary question. Mr. Yakeleya.
Question 231-16(3): Review Of Power Rates And Power Corporation Operations
Oral Questions

Norman Yakeleya Sahtu
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Then, would the lead Minister consider in terms of helping out with some of the communities in terms of their research because, again, they are going to be at a disadvantage in terms of putting together some real solutions if they’re just going to have a question and answer period in terms of the panel going through the communities. I ask if the Minister would look at his funds and see if there are some dollars available for the communities.
Question 231-16(3): Review Of Power Rates And Power Corporation Operations
Oral Questions

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South
The Member can be assured that we are working very closely with the NWT Association of Communities and we are funding the NWT Association of Communities so that all of the communities participate in a workshop that will be happening at the end of this month, March 30 and 31. As well, we are working very closely with the chambers of commerce and we will be talking about this review when they have the annual general meetings. All of the communities will be participating. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Question 231-16(3): Review Of Power Rates And Power Corporation Operations
Oral Questions
Question 231-16(3): Review Of Power Rates And Power Corporation Operations
Oral Questions

Norman Yakeleya Sahtu
Thank you, Minister, in terms of the disadvantages, the way I look at it is that the energy panel really has a lot of money in terms of putting together facts and information. The communities would have very little money. Even the Minister has said that the business communities have to pay their way, so I see that they’re disadvantaged in terms of how this process will be. However, again, I would ask if the Minister would continue to look for other avenues where the
communities can be properly funded to have a meaningful consultation. Thank you.