Mr. Speaker, the alternative energy process we’ve engaged in is one through the Ministerial Energy Coordinating Committee and Members to look at these alternatives. In fact, we’ve done it so that it doesn’t affect the rates, at this time, of how we implement some of the new technologies into our systems. We have to engage with the Power Corp at that level to see how we would do a full implementation. Again, looking at not impacting the rates of individuals. So that work is to be done.
The review itself that’s happening, looking at the Power Corp, the internal process was one of how it operates in today’s environment. Changes we want to make from their point out, that’s going on, will result at looking at a couple of things: One, we’ve committed to the energy rates subsidy review that’s happening; secondly, the Power Corporation specific review; and, thirdly, the ATCO proposal. At those stages we will be looking at what comes out of there and we’ll decide as to just how much of a change we want to make going forward. So, yes, we can look at the mandate and the structure. Alternative energies, we have a process we believe in and we’re trying to figure out just how we’ll plug it in to our existing frameworks that we have in place on that and when required on the review panel itself. Specific to the Power Corp review, I’m going to be getting Members information on just who that team is and go forward on that basis.