I believe we do have some perfect avenues to take. We have the Deh Cho Bridge Act to fall onto or whatever it is. It is in the process and legislation has passed in this House to take a look at that concept of building a bridge. We have the P3 policy that we are considering looking at with federal investment partnerships. I think that sometimes we have to think of unique ways of achieving these results. At the end of the day, in closing, I would just like to ask the Department of Transportation...This summer alone the ferry crossing on the Peel, because of flash floods or basically major rainstorms in the mountains, caused the ferry to shut down and there is a lot of concern by the residents of Fort McPherson and the people about the fish in that area. That the amount of gravel that is put into that river year after year after year, and having to replace that gravel every time you have a major flood, those materials, what effect is it having on the fish habitat? What effect is it having in regards to navigable waters?
I think that we, at the end of the day, have to realize that there is a liability associated with continuing to
run ferry operations, and realizing that we are having more severe flooding, that we are seeing more severe situations by way of having to close the ferry down because of simple high water, driftwood and everything else. We have to look at the possibility that at some point facing the piper in regards to having to realize that there is a liability associated with running ferry operations and what is the cost of that liability versus the environmental costs and the political and social costs to the communities that are seeing these implications. Thank you.