Thank you, Mr. Chair. The Member raised a few points there. I think he’s saying that because of these four programs it’s his opinion that our core need went up based on…(inaudible)…and the four programs cover just about everything. Even the overall houses that need repair affect our core need. That’s factored into our core need, public housing units. So that’s factored in and I think we’ve talked about the number of units that are under repair. That would obviously affect our core need.
I think in response to Mr. Krutko’s question before, or Mr. Bromley, we have 150 units that are under repair now that are vacant. That affects our core
need and this is the instruction that I’ve given to the Housing Corporation is exactly what the Member is referring to, is Members still feel like there’s some gaps in some of the programs and as the Minister I’ve heard it and I’ve raised the issue on numerous occasions. Some of the homeownership issues, there’s some gaps in there that have been brought to my attention and I’d like to work with the corporation to try and address some of these gaps if it means, you know, we’re not stuck on four, if it means adding another one where it will address some of the gaps that are there, then, you know, we’d be willing to have that discussion. But I think before there was I think 14 and it did get quite confusing for some people. Which one do I fit under? I think the four that we have now basically covers a wide range of people, pretty well all people. But, like I said, we’re not stuck on four and I’m looking forward to having a discussion with committee on some of the future direction that the Housing Corporation needs to go, but it is very important to me and to Members that we find a way to address some of the gaps, especially the homeownership gaps. Thank you, Mr. Chair.