We still want to put the units in the community. Land tenure is a very important issue and we can’t, as the Member actually pointed out as he was speaking, we can’t go to what he said, the day was where Housing...and I don’t think Housing just took anything, but maybe they worked out some agreements with people staying on those particular lands and I think we’re seeing more and more of that today where maybe there was some misinformation or misinterpretation or misunderstanding, but those things can be worked out.
The land tenure is the most important part, because we need to make sure we have proper land tenure so there’s not a dispute down the road saying, you know, we didn’t make an agreement for this land. We thought we had an agreement so we put a house up, and we don’t want to get into a situation where they’re saying put it on skids and pull it away
to another place. It’s in our best interest to make sure that the proper land tenure is there. It’s in the community’s best interest too. We’re starting to see a bit of an improvement in identifying lands for housing, so it’s something we’ll continue to work on. As far as saying that if land is not available you can’t put your unit there, that only makes sense because you can’t just put it up anywhere. We need to have those issues resolved, but we’ll do what we can to make sure they’re resolved before, as a last resort, maybe doing what the Member has alluded to. Thank you.