For tax-based municipalities, roughly what would that allocation be for the cost? Well, let’s put them all together, I guess, to get a sense of tax-based municipalities that the Department of Municipal and Community Affairs does not charge back.

Minister of MACA.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. We don’t have those numbers right now as to what it costs us to do those assessments, but we can attempt to gather that information and I will pass it on to the Member.

Obviously, the Minister doesn’t have the information here today, as he said, but would he be able to have it broken out by

community when he assesses the tax-based municipalities? Thank you.

We’ll break it out by communities.

Mr. Bromley.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I just wanted to follow up once again with my earlier questions, particularly this time with the biomass harvesting opportunities we have. I have before me that says ENR, ITI, and MACA will work to address issues related to land access and land claims that might impact development of biomass in the NWT. To me that casual sounding statement is quite important to our public. It really gets at cost of living, some of our issues on climate change, and some local economic development, especially in those communities that really, really need it. It goes towards the perspective of whether we’re going to talk about solutions or get them on the ground. So again, I haven’t been comfortable with the responses that they’re not aware of interest here.

This is supposed to be a cross-departmental initiative on these things: agriculture and biomass access. If the Minister recalls anything that they are doing on these, I’d like to hear about it and, again, I’d like to hear commitment. I don’t know where this would be in the budget other than on this page somewhere that we’re going to put some effort into actually dealing with these things, because they are relevant to the cost of living, as I say, and some of our broader goals of local economic development and environmental goals.

Minister of MACA.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The Member makes some good points. This is something we’ll have to look at in the future. I did make a commitment to the Member that I’ll gather some information. I’ll work with my colleagues at ENR and ITI and see about coming up with a plan. This is something that we will have to give some serious consideration to in the future. A lot of the harvesting out there just concerns Commissioner’s land. There’s a lot of harvesting out there on private claimed land. There’s a lot of harvesting out there on federal land. I did commit to the Member that I will work with my colleagues at ITI and ENR.

I appreciate that commitment. I think these aren’t issues that we should sit back on and let them come to us. I think the Minister is there. I look forward to his comments. These are obviously issues that we should move proactively on and take it to the people, anticipating that there will be increased interest, although we know there is interest already. I appreciate that commitment and I’ll look forward to finding out ways that I can help.

More of a comment. Municipal and Community Affairs, activity summary, lands administration, operations expenditure summary, $2.568 million.

Municipal and Community Affairs, information item, active positions, lands administration. Questions?

Page 6-33, Municipal and Community Affairs, activity summary, sport, recreation and youth, operations expenditure summary, $5.617 million. Ms. Bisaro.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have some questions here with regard to multisport games. Somewhere, I believe it was in business plans, we were advised that there was -- and I’m not exactly sure who -- the department was looking at sort of a long-term plan for multisport games. I wonder if I could get some kind of an answer to that. I’m not sure exactly what was referenced, but if the Minister could advise whether or not there is any kind of a plan that is going to be in the works with regard to evaluation of multisport games and the whole Sport and Rec Council issue as well.

Minister of MACA.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Well, the Multisport Games Review, some of the recommendations that were made we’re following up on. The review is completed. The department’s completed its review of the input received on the multisport games and has agreed with the NWT Sport and Recreation Council to move towards developing a long-term strategy to stabilize the delivery of NWT participation in the games. So there were some recommendations that were made that we are following up on and are hoping to share our findings with committee and get some input back from them.

So in terms of the Sport and Recreation Council, is there any consideration to looking at the structure of the various organizations that deal with multisport games and/or just sort of games in general, even regional games and so on? There are a number of sporting organizations that exist that come under the umbrella of the Sport and Recreation Council. Is there any intention to look at how those organizations work together, don’t work together, whether or not the Sport and Recreation Council setup should be changed, et cetera?

The Sport and Recreation Council is set up. They receive the funding. Some of the other groups within their organizations, the Aboriginal Sport Circle, for example, would manage the North American Indigenous Games, and they might reach an agreement with Sport North to manage the Arctic

Winter Games and Canada Games. So these groups are all working together quite well under the umbrella of the Sport and Recreation Council.

I’m sorry; maybe I wasn’t clear to the Minister. I was actually referencing the organization of SRC and the various groups that fall underneath it outside of games. I know that the games actually work reasonably well. At one point I had understood there was going to be an evaluation of the SRC and how well it was working and the groups within it and so on. Is that on the radar anywhere?

Not that I’m aware of. I don’t recall an evaluation of the SRC. It’s a fairly new organization. However, I suppose if there’s a feeling amongst Members that this is something that needs to be considered, then we’d have to have a look at that. But the short answer is no.