Thank you. Later today I will be tabling a document called What We Have Heard, and we outline everything that we have heard in all of our consultations and meetings we have had. We’ve had very frank and direct comments from our people. Also on the website there might have been yes or no questions, but there was always room for somebody to put in their input.
People have called us; people have e-mailed us; people have talked to me on the phone; they have called me. In the Northwest Territories we live in a very small space and we know everybody, a big space, but we know each other, and so I have had input from the people, as have the MLAs.
The challenge we have here is what we are talking about is a very, very difficult thing to talk about. When you are talking about anything to do with health benefits it is a very, very difficult thing to do. There are certain things we have to talk about: universality versus co-payment, non-insured health services versus insured health services, catastrophic drugs versus regular drug costs. All those things a lot of people don’t want us to change that at all. So I don’t think it’s necessarily true that there was a flaw in the consultation. It’s just that, at the end of the day, it is difficult to make changes. Thank you.