I agree 100 percent. I think about our long-term costs, given that our funds are decreasing, I think it’s super important.
Which I think goes to the next thing and I know my colleague Mr. Bromley always asks these types of questions, and I know the Housing Corporation has already accepted a standard of construction that is higher than, say, the national standard. When it comes to what we’re doing, I mean, it’s a little bit more expensive to do some of these things now to increase our efficiencies, to go with pellets, to go with other things, woodstoves, all these types of things in our communities, but there is some real benefit to it. Forget the positive side of the environment and just think about the positive side of the costs. Huge opportunities here to help people reduce their costs which might address some of those things we were talking about earlier today.
I encourage you to continue to push the envelope as the Housing Corporation and move even further beyond what you’re doing as far as efficiencies in the homes, your construction techniques to help the people in those homes and ultimately you as the Housing Corporation reduce your costs, because it’s going to get harder and harder over time, especially with the decreasing funds.
I’m encouraging you to push and push and push and move further and further beyond the national standards for building to increase those efficiencies and opportunities to help us save costs. Just a comment. Doesn’t really need a response.