Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, yesterday I tabled a process convention that was fully agreed upon by Caucus in Fort Smith last summer on the standing committee review of proposed policy initiatives and implementation plans. This process convention outlines the roles of Cabinet, Ministers and committees, when it comes to establishing new policies or making substantive amendments to or rescinding of existing policies.
This process convention does not apply to minor administrative amendments which will not significantly impact established policy commitments.
I suggest that the proposed changes to the Extended Health Benefits Program being implemented by the Minister of Health and Social Services are not minor administrative amendments and that the changes will significantly impact all residents of the Northwest Territories. As such, I believe the Minister is responsible for ensuring that all of the proposed changes and implementation tools must go through appropriate standing committee for review prior to implementation. Not just a presentation of the information, but a discussion, a debate and actual consultation.
The Premier of the Northwest Territories is responsible for ensuring that his Cabinet follows all of the terms and conditions contained within the approved process convention. Later this afternoon I’ll be asking the Premier some questions on how it’s possible that one of his Ministers could stray so far from the approved conventions. Specifically, given that the new plan is proposed for development in June 2010, after the close of this session, with implementation on September 30, 2010, prior to the fall session in October, I wonder how this Minister can possibly adhere to the agreed upon process convention. Specifically with respect to paragraph 8 which states, “when Cabinet decides to establish a new policy review, the application of an existing policy or substantively amend an existing policy in accordance with this convention, the Minister responsible for the implementing policy will provide both Cabinet and the appropriate standing committee with briefings on the relevant implementation and communications plans, as well as any significant implementation tools” -- example: ministerial policies, eligibility criteria, program guidelines – “in advance of the policy’s application or implementation in any substantive public communications.” To date, we have seen no program guidelines.
It’s possible that the Premier will respond consistently with the Minister’s remarks that committee has been consulted all along.
Mr. Speaker, I seek unanimous consent to conclude my statement.
---Unanimous consent granted