I don’t think I could counter that. I think that’s something that could be argued. All sin taxes we have to weigh the balance between providing a disincentive by raising the taxes, but we are aware that those who are severely addicted will get those items no matter what, against their self-interest and the well-being of themselves and the families around them. The flip side of that coin is if even without taxes being raised, probably those other people who because of their addiction issues do not spend money where they should be, on their families, anyway. I don’t think there’s any right or wrong answer to that.
Going back to your original question, the deputy ministers are on the steering committee that review those implications and the Ministers discuss and consider all those impacts as well.