In regard to my original question, I think that we have to be fair here. I mean, sure, we can say, well, we gave them the housing and they’re responsible to take care of it. We didn’t give them the house. In most cases they applied on it, they won it fairly through an application process and in most cases, like you say, these people have lived in these units going on 30 years. After 30 years of living in a unit it is going to require some major retrofits, regardless if its electrical upgrades or mechanical changeovers. That’s when these people need the help. I think that those are the groups that we should be focusing on when you have people that realize that there are energy retrofits that need to take place and that will make and improve the life of that facility. But when you have people getting programs where you have three or four members in a house making over $250,000, I mean, that’s not fair to other people in their community that are applying for programs and
can’t get it. Especially widows and people that have children and they are struggling. Yet we seem to have not helped those people that really require the help and yet there’s other people taking advantage of programs and services time after time and not helping the people that really need the help.
I think all I’m asking for is that we seriously... Again, you look at the dollars that have been earmarked for grants and contributions, they’re down by $6 million. We have to realize we have less money now than we had before and we have to make sure that we spend it in the best interest of the public and the people that we serve.