I will be pleased to provide the Member with information on the number of employees with NTEC and with regards to an accounting of, or a reconciliation of, the numbers. We are quite open about it. We have provided this information on a regular basis to committee, and committee is well aware of what we did and it is no big secret. They dividend as they review, the team recommended that was part of what was causing
the high cost of electricity. That will remain with NTEC for this year and potentially for further years.
With regards to the buy-down of the rate riders, we used money that had been identified for commercial subsidies of $3 million a year and our expectation is that there will be savings in the Territorial Power Subsidy Program, which was forecasted to go as high as $14 million and it will be substantially less, so our expectation is that within two years we will have a lot more flexibility. There will be savings that could be... If the future government decides to apply it to energy costs in the future, that is their prerogative. As well, the energy costs of the government remain the same. Part of the direction was that government rates would remain the same and it is not unusual, other jurisdictions do that routinely. Look at the Yukon, they have frozen all the rates, different rates at different levels, including government rates that pay a higher rate than local consumers. So we are quite prepared to provide all of that information again to committee and to the Member. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.