There was no waiving of notice of Members. It is a natural part of the decision to provide an exemption to indemnification where the process that was followed is a standard practice and has been in place since 1999. This decision to do that as a normal part of business -- and governments across the land use this as a tool -- was to address the need to indemnify, in the initial case, the Deh Cho Bridge Corporation and then follow up with the lenders. We could read out exactly what that indemnification meant. Again, in the paper, in the response that I gave to committee we did reflect on the need to adjust the current processes going forward and reference the work that was ongoing, for example, in the Financial Administration Act. That work is still ongoing that would look towards those issues.
Floyd Roland on Question 570-16(5): Auditor General’s Report On The Special Audit Of The Deh Cho Bridge Project
In the Legislative Assembly on March 3rd, 2011. See this statement in context.
Question 570-16(5): Auditor General’s Report On The Special Audit Of The Deh Cho Bridge Project
Oral Questions
March 2nd, 2011
Inuvik Boot Lake
See context to find out what was said next.