The Member has been quoting from documents that I don’t have. I take his point about consultation. This is a federal process. This is federal legislation. We have been, for the most part, up until recently, treated like a stakeholder, much to our chagrin. They’re expecting the second draft. Most of the changes being contemplated at this point are legislative in nature. There’s been no significant reply to our response to the McCrank Report that we submitted back in 2009 where there was significant changes put forward and recommended by Mr. McCrank, some of which we took exception to and did not support. That report is public and filed. This process so far is federally driven and is focussing a lot, by our estimation, on legislative changes.
Michael Miltenberger on Question 93-16(6): GNWT Involvement In Amendments To The Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act
In the Legislative Assembly on May 17th, 2011. See this statement in context.
Question 93-16(6): GNWT Involvement In Amendments To The Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act
Oral Questions
May 16th, 2011
See context to find out what was said next.