Well, I’m going to have to take a stab because my earpiece doesn’t work and I can’t hear anybody over there. All I heard was something about it showing up and not said. That’s not the people providing the rebut, but I mean, quite frankly I keep thinking I’m hearing that it just shows up as income on page 7-26 but it’s just treated as money that disappears.
I would say from a good accounting practice I think my point still should stand and I think any accountant would be quite concerned that it sort of disappears into general revenue if it’s just clawed back. This is more than an administrative exercise. This is a financial exercise taken out of people’s budgets. Whether you’re MLAs buying computers or getting support, it comes off your budget. If your department of whatever, whether you’re Health or Education or MACA or ITI, whatever the case may be, your money is being taken out of the global budget and it should show up as revenue somewhere because it’s treated as income on this page and I would say, but it doesn’t look like it shows up as income. I’m just not sure what to say other than that. The income should show up as a line item clearly somewhere else. People need to know where the money is going. It just seems odd that…They didn’t say the words “trust me,” but if you read between the lines it’s like, don’t worry, we’ve taken care of it. What are they going to do to articulate it somewhere on a budget line item that shows that they’ve captured $18 million-plus?