We’ve been looking at this and it’s always been my opinion, unsubstantiated by necessarily an expensive study, but that in dealing with e-waste that we would be much better off to work out an arrangement with a large jurisdiction like Alberta, in particular, or in our case Edmonton, where they have the facilities set up and we would make arrangements to process our e-waste through their infrastructure as opposed to us trying to set up a similar kind of service. We’re trying to sort out what’s the best way. I don’t necessarily see it at this point, once again not having seen the final report, as a revenue generator. It will be something that will generate us savings if you do full cost accounting and the amount of waste that won’t go into our landfills and the savings that that would entail for starters. Thank you.
Michael Miltenberger on Committee Motion 3-17(3): Deferral Of Consideration Of Estimates For Environment Activity, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on June 4th, 2012. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 3-17(3): Deferral Of Consideration Of Estimates For Environment Activity, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
June 3rd, 2012
See context to find out what was said next.