I’m not sure if the word is legally binding or legally bound. It’s a bit confusing. The reason I’m asking that first question is that legally binding, when we first negotiated this price with Ruskin, there was obviously holdbacks involved. These are legal parts of large-scale projects. Anyone who builds houses or any type of infrastructure knows that. What’s happening now with these holdbacks? Are these being leveraged, and if not, why not?
Daryl Dolynny on Question 104-17(3): Deh Cho Bridge Project Cost Overruns
In the Legislative Assembly on June 7th, 2012. See this statement in context.
Question 104-17(3): Deh Cho Bridge Project Cost Overruns
Oral Questions
June 6th, 2012
See context to find out what was said next.