The number that was used is there was $7 million residual in that fund that we kept in accrued interest and such and we’re putting into the planning process is slated towards economic issues. This is talking about history that can be changed. The harsh reality for me was we hadn’t lent this money out. We were lending it to ourselves. We had $125 million in the bank that, according to how the federal government did their accounting, was considered a debt. So for most people if you think you have $125 million cash, they had given it to us through their Immigrant Investor Fund. It was cash in the bank.
We weren’t lending it out after the Discovery loan because of the debate over where it was going to be accounted for and would we have to roll it up. We had to deal with that reality that even though it didn’t make sense and, yes, we had a stack of applications that the Minister of ITI had, of potential business ventures that we would have gotten a good return on our dollar for, in the broad scheme of things, the choice was we had to turn it back because we weren’t going to get that bump up in our borrowing limit to allow for that and our bigger goal was the deal with the issue of the borrowing limit because of all the other pressures we had, due to the stopping of the stimulus money and the using of all our free capital to make sure that we took full advantage of the stimulus program that was happening in the last three years of the last Assembly.