The old Minister kept articulating that it would open in the fall of 2011, then he insisted it would be open in the fall of 2012 through the process. What particularly changed that we are unable to fulfill under the existing contract? It had a schedule of the previous year to be opened, and for some reason there clearly is slippage, as someone would use in the terminology here. What part of the slippage is our fault and what part of the slippage is their fault, and can we get some details as to what the slippage actually is? Because we did have a schedule on this previously; actually, a couple of times. Why is the contractor not responsible for the slippage in schedule?
Robert Hawkins on Committee Motion To Extend Sitting Hours, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on June 8th, 2012. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion To Extend Sitting Hours, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
June 7th, 2012
See context to find out what was said next.