Earlier the Minister had assured me that, of course, they invoked the privilege of moving the motion to extend today’s sittings for as long as possible, and my point of that contradiction was knowing that one person cannot carry the fire forever. That’s what I meant about forcing the process to go. If we had followed through today’s normal schedule we would have ended at two o’clock, and we would have been able to get this type of information on the side, whether it’s in committee or have some discussions after hours. I feel terrible. I’m not trying to hold the process hostage here by any means, but I feel terrible that that’s what I was referring to, is the fact that they’ve almost, not closed debate but opened it up in a way that it’s not easy to deal with.
In that comment from the Minister to remind me about the way the process works, I know very well how it works. He assured me all questions would be answered. I’m asking questions about explaining what the claims process is and why we didn’t… I want to find out why our analysis did not allow us to proceed with claims. We can do a follow up. We have holdbacks. I assume we have holdbacks. Maybe we don’t. That’s part of the issue, is the fact that we’re not getting the answers, or certainly I’m not getting the answers, as to what claims were that significant we saw and why we couldn’t invoke the present contract, that sounds like it’s still in force, to make them comply with the schedule. That’s part of the issue.