Is there a clear distinction as to why we would just not bother with the chargeback at all and just get FMB to fund, for example, Public Works an additional $20 million and avoid the additional, sort of, paperwork and the flow to each individual department and the accountability on that sense?
Because in some respects, I heard the Minister’s point. I realize it, which is it’s just a direct flow-through of payment schedule when it comes to, say, the power bill or the fuel bill. But in this one, what about maintenance? The department, say, maintains, I’ll say a school. That might not be the best example, but it is an example. But we don’t do a chargeback for that. Public Works is expected to absorb that cost as part of their mandate.
Wouldn’t one then be able to derive that providing technical services through our system – outside of maybe hardware, that is, because each individual department can prescribe or demand their own services as necessary – wouldn’t it then seem logical that we would do a consistent pattern with computer services?