Thanks, Mr. Chair. I just wanted to ask a question here. The description indicates that this is a department over-expenditure, but then it also says it doesn’t represent an additional outlay of cash. Could I just get a bit of an explanation as to why we have an over-expenditure that doesn’t actually affect our bottom line, from the sounds of things? Thank you.
Wendy Bisaro on Committee Motion 21-17(4): Concurrence Of Supplementary Estimates (Infrastructure Expenditures), No. 4, 2011-2012, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on March 12th, 2013. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 21-17(4): Concurrence Of Supplementary Estimates (Infrastructure Expenditures), No. 4, 2011-2012, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
March 11th, 2013
See context to find out what was said next.