Really, if we start adding up the numbers, about 50 percent of this $100,000 is set aside for, basically, travel, accommodations and a function. I’m trying to see how this fits in the original bylaws of the Legislative Building Society. I have a hard time fitting that in.
There are really muddy lines in the water when it looks at legacy and I think the public has shared their concern about this a number of times as well. Let’s be clear. I’m all for having a nice time to commemorate the building. I don’t want people to think I’m a party pooper here. I’m not. Far from it. But this is now public money. I have to do my job and ask those right questions.
I don’t have any further questions on this one here, but it raises some big question marks, really, in the true intent of what was originally earmarked 20 years ago. I am not sure that the Building Society had a party in mind. Thank you, Mr. Chair.