With the issue of oversight, there has been a general agreement. There were, in fact, letters written where the Giant Mine Remediation Project Environmental Monitoring Advisory Committee would not make decisions with respect to the operations of the project. Operation responsibilities and decisions would remain with the developer in a joint letter in response to the review board on June 11, 2012. The question is what type of an oversight, and there’s a difference of opinion between the oversight meaning a veto and oversight means best advice and recommendations as we on the operational side as responsible Ministers do the work necessary to remediate that particular site. Thank you.
Michael Miltenberger on Question 27-17(5): Environmental Assessment Of Giant Mine Remediation Project
In the Legislative Assembly on November 7th, 2013. See this statement in context.
Question 27-17(5): Environmental Assessment Of Giant Mine Remediation Project
Oral Questions
November 6th, 2013
See context to find out what was said next.