This is page numbers 2333 – 2388 of the Hansard for the 17th Assembly, 4th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was community.

Topics

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Wendy Bisaro

Wendy Bisaro Frame Lake

Thank you, Madam Chair. I just have a couple of comments here. I’ll start where Mr. Dolynny left off with the Mackenzie Valley Highway, the road from Inuvik to Tuk. I, too, am concerned. I appreciate that the Minister has advised that we haven’t got a decision yet, but we also don’t yet know the total cost of the project. Sometimes I feel that we are heading pell-mell down a road without considering what’s at the end of the road when we get there, and I just want to say that I am extremely cautious about this project. Once bitten, twice shy. And the Deh Cho Bridge, having gone through the Deh Cho Bridge Project, it certainly puts a different spin and view on what I see in terms of projects and the large costs involved, so I will be exercising caution. I appreciate no decision has been made, but I encourage the department to recognize that

there are a lot of unanswered questions on the part of Members and I think probably on the part of the department itself. Let’s just make sure we know what we’re getting ourselves into.

The Minister talked about a net decrease in his opening comments, a net decrease of $3.4 million to the budget from the previous year’s budget. That sounds great. There is a reduction in some of the costs with taking the ferry out of service and so on, and not having an ice road to build across the river anymore. I think we have to remember that we are reducing the Transportation budget, but we are increasing the budget in Finance by $8 million to deal with the interest on the Deh Cho Bridge loans. Now that the bridge is open and operating, we are starting to pay interest on those loans that we have. So we can’t lose sight of the fact that one department has gone down but another one has gone up significantly.

I had a bit of a concern with the fee increases. I’m sort of struggling with that. The Minister mentioned that adjustments to bring fees up to date, with the majority of fee increases ranging from 15 to 20 percent. I can appreciate that we probably were a little behind with our fee increases. We probably haven’t brought them up to date for a number of years, but I saw the 15 and 20 percent and thought, as a consumer, I’m not all that happy to have an increase of 15 to 20 percent. Even 5 percent these days is enough, thank you very much. From what I understand, some increases may be as high as 30 percent. I certainly hope the department will, in the future, manage to keep fees closer to sort of I guess annual increments, if that’s necessary, or say every two years or so, so that we’re not seeing a big, healthy dose of increased fees at any one time.

The Minister mentioned the opening of the Deh Cho Bridge. I was lucky enough to be able to be there that day. Although it was extremely cold, it was a really exciting day. I know I shared the Minister’s excitement. It certainly was an historic event for me and I truly enjoyed the opportunity to be part of it. So thanks to the Minister and the department for that. Also, thank you for actually getting the bridge open. That was great. It was a long time coming, but it was really good that it was finally done.

The Minister talked a lot about improving economic development opportunities in his opening remarks. He talked about the need for transportation infrastructure, and I agree. We can’t have mines without roads to service those mines, but I am a little struck by the fact that we’re not talking at all about the environment and sustaining the environment, and tempering our push for economic opportunities in transportation infrastructure with making sure that we are considering the environment at the same time. This government, in my mind, has a bit too much focus and emphasis on economic opportunities, to the detriment of our

environment and our land and water. I put that forward as just a mention.

I did forget to mention that Mr. Bromley, unfortunately, isn’t feeling well, but he asked me to bring forward this particular concern of his. I believe it’s on the revenue page in the budget where we have, according to the Minister’s comments, increased our fees, but we don’t see a corresponding increase in revenue. I look at road licensing and safety fees and they’ve gone down to $144,000 from $589,000 in 2012-13. Those two statements, the numbers in the book and the statement by the Minister don’t jive, so he and I would appreciate an explanation when we get to that point. Even if we look at total revenue, we’ve gone from $9.6 million to $12.9 million, which is about $3.3 million. We are increasing our revenue through tolls of $4 million, I think was in the Minister’s opening comments. Again, it doesn’t really jive if we are increasing our licensing and other fees and we’re not really increasing our revenue from what the numbers say.

That’s all I had, Madam Chair. Thank you.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Jane Groenewegen

Thank you, Ms. Bisaro. Are there any further general comments on the Department of Transportation?

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Some Hon. Members

Detail.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Jane Groenewegen

Okay, thank you. I guess I should let the Minister respond. Mr. Ramsay.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

David Ramsay

David Ramsay Kam Lake

Thank you, Madam Chair. I appreciate the Members’ comments on our budget. It’s important for us to hear Members’ concerns.

I know we had a good discussion today about the Inuvik-Tuk highway during question period. I’m sure there will be more questions as we get into some of the detail. Although there is no money per se in the budget this year for the Inuvik-Tuk highway, I would be more than happy, under the highways section, to answer any questions Members may have. It would be very interesting and maybe I’ll just put this out there. Any questions, I am very curious to know what we haven’t told Members, what we haven’t come forward with during the briefing that we had with Members. If Members have any questions, we would be more than happy to answer them. I think we need to ensure that Members aren’t left with the feeling that we’re not telling them something. I’d like to know that if there’s something we’re not telling them about the Inuvik-Tuk highway, what exactly is it? We’ll get you the answer. There are a lot of unknowns. If those questions point to something that is an unknown, we’ll tell you that it’s unknown. But I think we’ve been forthcoming, we’ve been upfront with Members and we will continue to be upfront with Members.

This is a big project. It’s building this territory. It’s connecting Inuvik to Tuktoyaktuk, a road coast to coast to coast. It’s a big, big project. It’s something that we need to make sure that we get it right. We need to also ensure that we are answering every question that Members have. We certainly don’t want any Member feeling like we are doing things behind their back or behind closed doors. That’s not the case. Once we get the agreements and approvals from the federal government and we get the deal put together, the public will know what exactly we’re proposing and, at the end of the day, that will be discussed on the floor of this House. Decisions will be made whether or not to move the project forward. Members will have every opportunity to ask questions about the project and, at the end of the day, whether they support the project and however it ends up falling out, we piece it together, that’s how that will work. Again, I look forward to questions. We’re here to answer questions, so I look forward to that.

I know there are some other issues that came up. We’ll get to those through the detail. I’m very thankful for MLA Bisaro mentioning the Deh Cho Bridge. That was a big day for us. We are glad that she and some other Members could be there on the big day when we cut the ribbon on the Deh Cho Bridge, got it into service and are collecting tolls on that key piece of infrastructure here in the Northwest Territories. With that, I’ll look forward to the questions as we get into detail. Thank you.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Jane Groenewegen

Thank you, Minister Ramsay. I’ll ask Members if they would pass by page 11-7. We will return to that at the end of the consideration of the Department of Transportation. So then on to page 11-8, Transportation, information item, infrastructure investment summary. Agreed?

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Some Hon. Members

Agreed.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Jane Groenewegen

Thank you. Page 11-9, Transportation, revenue summary, information item. Ms. Bisaro.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Wendy Bisaro

Wendy Bisaro Frame Lake

Thanks, Madam Chair. If I could ask for an explanation of the referencing fees for licences, fees, licences and permits – the toll permits I understand – and registrations. Registrations have gone up but fees particularly, road licensing and safety fees have gone way down and the total revenue has only increased. It hasn’t increased the $4 million that we are gaining in our tolls. If I can get an explanation of these revenue numbers. Thank you.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Jane Groenewegen

Thank you, Ms. Bisaro. Minister Ramsay.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

David Ramsay

David Ramsay Kam Lake

Thanks, Madam Chair. Thanks to the Member for the question. There was a lot of juggling around with our fees, and for a

detailed response, probably best to answer that would be Deputy Minister Neudorf.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Jane Groenewegen

Thank you, Minister Ramsay. Mr. Neudorf.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Russ Neudorf

Thank you, Madam Chair. There were four different adjustments that we made to our fees this year that were in the general section. First is that we took the service fees, so the $12 typical fee when you go and register your vehicle, we are going to add that $12 fee. Instead of it being separate, it’s going to be added to the base amount of the registration, so the net cost is going to be the same but we aren’t going to be specifically charging that service fee. We moved some of the revenue that was reported underneath that line item, road licensing and safety fees, into the applicable category.

We also, as the Member indicated before, made a number of adjustments to our revenue to catch it up to the current market rates. In a number of cases those fees hadn’t changed for quite a number of years so the increases were a little higher. Some averaged, I think, in the 15 to 20 percent range. That total revenue included here is $529,000 in various categories. Some in the airport landing fees and some in the licensing and safety fees.

The Deh Cho Bridge toll revenues are there, $4.01 million. Those were already added to the 2012-2013 revised mains. We’re projecting to get $1.3 million in this fiscal year. After the bridge came into service November 30th then the final adjustment

was just to reflect actuals.

In airport landing and other fees in particular, our projections from last year were a little bit too optimistic and, in fact, to meet actuals we adjusted it down by about $300,000.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Jane Groenewegen

Thank you, Mr. Neudorf. Ms. Bisaro.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Wendy Bisaro

Wendy Bisaro Frame Lake

Thank you, Madam Chair. Thanks to the DM for that explanation. I think I totally understand. I heard him say that we had an increase of about $529,000 through the fees and licensing and so on, the revenue from those. Then we increased our toll permits about $3 million, it looks like, $2.7 million. I guess the numbers do add up. It’s about $3 million difference in revenue in total. Okay. Never mind. I talked myself out of my question.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Jane Groenewegen

Thank you, Ms. Bisaro. Glad we could help you out with that. Mr. Dolynny.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Daryl Dolynny

Daryl Dolynny Range Lake

Thank you, Madam Chair. In the title-ship of corporate services, I know it encompasses a lot of operation expenditures so I want to first talk about the remaining money that could still not be spent. This money was from the Building Canada Plan, which I believe ceased in

2011. I know there are residual monies that are usually put into stasis or basically in a holding pattern.

Can the Minister indicate if all the money under the previous federal Building Canada Plan has been spent or are there still projects outstanding, tied or attached to that resource money?

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Jane Groenewegen

Thank you, Mr. Dolynny. Mr. Ramsay.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

David Ramsay

David Ramsay Kam Lake

Thank you, Madam Chair. There is still some of that Building Canada money in the 2013-2014 Capital Plan as well as some research and development money. If the Member wants specifics, we could provide him with specifics.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Daryl Dolynny

Daryl Dolynny Range Lake

We’ll take the Minister up on his offer and ask him to give Members an update as to what is left in spending in that money and what is pending for projects.

On a different subject under the same topic, the issue of regulatory changes in transportation and the impacts that they could have on the operations within the NWT, can the Minister indicate those federal changes that are being discussed and that were discussed, how is that impacting our operations in the NWT to meet those federal requirements?

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Jane Groenewegen

Thank you, Mr. Dolynny. Mr. Neudorf.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Russ Neudorf

Thank you, Madam Chair. Just in terms of the Building Canada Plan, in 2013-2014 our capital plan still has three specific projects that have BCP capital funding: the Highway No. 4 reconstruction; the Highway No. 1, 187 to 411; and the Highway No. 8 reconstruction. Three capital projects that would have been approved in the fall capital plan.

Then we also have about $250,000 that would be for BCP R and D that would be allocated next year. In terms of the regulatory changes and the impact, the place that it’s being felt the most is in our airports division where we need to operate our airports in accordance with Transport Canada regulations. There have been a few changes over the last three or five years or so that we’ve been implementing. By far the biggest one would be the implementation of safety management systems. We’re actually in year four of four, so we are nearing the end and getting all of our documents and procedures in place.

We have come forward with two forced-growth items for that in the past. One in the past where we got some extra positions and funding to meet the various requirements there, then there’s forced growth as part of the budget here that brings three additional positions into DOT, one in Inuvik Airport, one in Fort Simpson Airport, both to have help with

the operations, and meet the extra requirements for reporting and conducting emergency exercises and wildlife management plans, and then another in Yellowknife here to deal with the extra technical documentation required as part of safety management systems.

The other two areas that have seen significant changes is, first, on emergency response planning where we now have to go into communities that are with certified airports on a regular basis, once a year, and conduct a live exercise and do planning for that. It takes a considerable amount of planning to conduct those exercises, particularly in our smaller communities. It is, of course, a benefit to do that, a benefit for DOT to potentially deal with an emergency in an airport, but also a benefit to communities because they can learn the process to go through an emergency exercise and how to deal with those. We do work closely with the RCMP, with Health, and with MACA in planning those.

In terms of other regulatory changes, I think the federal government changes with Bill C-38 and Bill C-45, the Navigable Waters Act and the Fisheries Act, where, from a DOT perspective, we think that they do go a long way to simplify the rules to make them clearer and to make our job and the requirements to meet those various regulatory requirements much more straightforward to fulfill.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Daryl Dolynny

Daryl Dolynny Range Lake

I appreciate Mr. Neudorf’s response to that here. In the reply to the question I believe there were about four airports that were mentioned in terms of improvements in the safety requirements. I did hear that this is year four of five of an implementation program. Can we get more detail on how many airports are still not meeting the so-called federal requirements of the total amount of airports that we have under our guidance?

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Russ Neudorf

All of our airports meet existing Transport Canada requirements. All of them are safe. Many of the airports would have some deviations to them so that there are specific requirements or things that would require a deviation from what would be ideal from a Transport Canada regulatory perspective. They are all safe. They do all meet regulatory requirements. Our airports that have regular scheduled service into them by carriers are all certified airports. We have to go through a process to get them certified. Transport Canada provides that so that carriers can operate on a scheduled basis into the program.

The requirements to operate the airports to ensure certification to meet the emergency response requirements have been changing over the last few years, and I mentioned that we’re in year four of four of safety management system implementations. We’re nearing the end of that. We have been able to meet all of those requirements. It has taken some additional personnel and additional

budget adjustments to do it, but we are able to meet all of the Transport Canada requirements.

Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Daryl Dolynny

Daryl Dolynny Range Lake

I’m getting the fact that our airports are meeting all federal regulatory requirements and that there’s just some safety management systems or emergency response planning left to be fulfilled. If I am indeed in error, I would ask the Minister or deputy minister to correct me. That said, can the Minister or department indicate to me, the emergency response planning that happens at airport or airport authorities, how close does that mimic or work with any of the emergency community plans that would be involved with those communities that do have airport or airport authorities? Are we talking the same document or a separate document?