Thanks to Mr. Fulford for that. I kind of thought that was the case. I think my concern is that the requirement may be there, but as I understand it, the amount of either the financial security or the need to have the closure and the reclamation plans is up to the regulator, and if the regulator makes a determination and determines an amount of money that is not what is required or accepts a remediation plan that’s in its infancy and isn’t updated over the years as the development occurs, we’re going to be left holding the bag when the development ends or it folds in the midst of production and everybody runs away and we’re left cleaning things up.
I think my question goes more to what there is either within the regulations or within the act that we can use, one, to make sure that the regulator sets appropriate amounts of financial security and demands appropriate closure and reclamation plans, and secondly, what do we have that’s going to enforce whatever it is that’s decided on for a development?