Thank you, Mr. Chair. As I mentioned in my previous remark, these were technical reasons for removing the definition. There is no desire to remove anything. In this case the test is that the previous definition contained “who, in the opinion of the Minister, is suitable for continued employment in the public service” has been moved to the substantive provision. In taking a holistic approach, nothing has been lost from the repeal of the definition. Thank you.
Mr. Chutskoff on Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
In the Legislative Assembly on October 31st, 2014. See this statement in context.
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
October 30th, 2014
Chutskoff
See context to find out what was said next.