Thank you, Mr. Chair. I certainly didn’t follow the Member’s details in terms of the variance, so if he’s got more details, we can certainly answer any specific questions there.
I would note that our main estimates from last fiscal year to proposed ’15-16 are proposed to go down by $6.7 million. The majority of that, $5.7 million, is due to amortization, so it’s not real cash, but our budget is in fact going down from last year to proposed for next year.
Overall, on the capital side of course we did ask for and receive $40 million for the Inuvik-Tuk highway so that we could…but it was just a cash flow adjustment. It was advancing the cash flow in order to reflect the progress that the contractor was expecting to make.
In terms of the Inuvik Airport dip repair, it did take time to come up with the right answer so that the engineers were comfortable that the solution we came up with would actually address the problem. We do think that there’s water moving underneath the runway and that has caused some material to be eroded away from underneath the runway, so that’s what we want to repair. That repair was started last fall, so we’re creating a cut-off ditch to divert the water away from the runway so that doesn’t occur again. Then the plan is, if the funding is carried over, that we will undertake to put a permanent repair of the runway next summer. Really, it’s just making sure that we had maximized the benefit of the resources that were allocated to the project. Thank you, Mr. Chair.